schymans (@schymans@mastodon.social)
Do you use AI for answering questions? How does this compare to your traditional web search? Well for once, AI consumes an order of magnitude more energy per search. More importantly, you would actively separate the traditional search results into trustworthy and manipulative sources, finding that the former are only a small portion of the results. (1/2) #chatgpt #ai
Show Original Post
Luk (@Luk@mamot.fr)
« for [ #ChatGPT], convincing the world of these concepts is a lot harder than just saying “fuck it, remove the loud threatening complainers.” #ai https://www.techdirt.com/2024/12/03/the-curious-case-of-chatgpts-banned-names-hard-coding-blocks-to-avoid-nuisance-threats/
Show Original Post
objects (@objects@corteximplant.net)
Let Chat GPT speak for you - The new trend
Show Original Post
pantwo (@pantwo@botsin.space)
"Solid Perfume"
Imagine if a pumpkin became a disco ball and threw a party in a sunset. That's the color we're talking about - a wild mix of orange, yellow, and a hint of magic. It's like autumn on a tropical vacation.
#bot #color #design #pantone #parody #ChatGPT
Show Original Post
japan_cnet (@japan_cnet@rss-mstdn.studiofreesia.com)
「ChatGPT」、特定の人名について回答を拒否することが判明
https://japan.cnet.com/article/35226879/
#japan_cnet #ChatGPT
Show Original Post
DoomsdaysCW (@DoomsdaysCW@kolektiva.social)
Hmmmm... So, here is #AngusKing's response to my concerns about #HR9495. I take it he's a "yea". I believe there were some concerns about the amendment S. 4136 that Senator King refers to. How robust are these protections? And again, WHO DEFINES WHAT IS A TERRORIST? Mad King Donald? smh (Oh, and #SenatorSusanCollins didn't even bother to reply -- I guess I'm still on her shit list. Ooops!)
"Thank you for sharing your views with me on S. 4136. I recognize there are concerns that this bill will impact civil liberties—rest assured; I share your determination to protect nonprofits from any political or religious targeting. That’s why I sponsored S. 4136 after I determined the bill contains robust procedural protections to ensure it’s only used to police nonprofits that provide material support to terrorist groups. In my view, a nonprofit should not benefit from its tax-exempt status if it is financing terrorism.
"I worked closely with my colleague, Senator Cornyn, on S. 4136. This bill would permit the Department of the Treasury to terminate the tax-exempt status of a nonprofit that provides material support to terrorist groups, designating them as a terrorist supporting organization.
"The Secretary of the Treasury would be required to submit proof that the nonprofit organization provided material support to a terrorist group and allow for a pre-decisional remediation process. Once the Treasury Secretary suspends a nonprofit’s tax-exempt status, the nonprofit may appeal to the IRS’s Independent Office of Appeals. Should the Independent Office of Appeals decide against the nonprofit, the nonprofit can appeal to the U.S. District Courts. A court may have to review classified information to make a final determination. In such a case, protecting national security may require the court to review evidence privately, without a defendant present, and procedures for conducting such review already exist in other national security laws.
"It is important to note that S. 4136 is a product of bipartisan negotiations to provide the Treasury with effective anti-terrorism authorities while protecting the rights of nonprofit groups through thorough legal processes. In November of last year, the House Ways and Means Committee thoroughly reviewed the House version of my bill and its provisions, sending it to the full House by a unanimous vote. The bill passed the House by a strongly bipartisan vote of 382 to 11. Congress rarely agrees on even the most commonsense measures, let alone passes a bill with such broad bipartisan support.
"I believe the extensive procedural safeguards protect this process from abuse; given that it is clear to me that a non-profit which is proven to be a conduit for funds to a terrorist organization should not enjoy tax exempt status.
"Thank you for contacting me on this important issue; please be in touch with other matters of importance to you that come before the Senate."
Blah, blah, blah. Was this written by #ChatGPT?!!
Show Original Post
bespacific (@bespacific@newsie.social)
#Stanford 'lying and technology' expert admits to shoddy use of #ChatGPT in #legal filing #AI #legalresearch Jeff Hancock made the ironic errors in a Nov. 1 filing for a MN court case over state’s new ban on political deepfakes. An oft-cited researcher at Bay Area school and the founding director of the Stanford Social Media Lab, Hancock defended the law with an “expert declaration” document that, he admitted Wednesday, contained two made-up citations and one other error. https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/stanford-expert-gpt-minnesota-deepfakes-19954595.php
Show Original Post
Bongolian (@Bongolian@mstdn.social)
Stephen Council: #Stanford 'lying and technology' expert admits to shoddy use of #ChatGPT in legal filing
"A Stanford University professor and #misinformation expert accused of making up citations in a court filing has apologized — and blamed the gaffe on his sloppy use of ChatGPT.
Jeff Hancock made the ironic errors in a Nov. 1 filing for a Minnesota court case over the state’s new ban on political deepfakes."
#AI
https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/stanford-expert-gpt-minnesota-deepfakes-19954595.php
Show Original Post
Bongolian (@Bongolian@mstdn.social)
Stephen Council: #Stanford 'lying and technology' expert admits to shoddy use of #ChatGPT in legal filing
"A Stanford University professor and #misinformation expert accused of making up citations in a court filing has apologized — and blamed the gaffe on his sloppy use of ChatGPT.
Jeff Hancock made the ironic errors in a Nov. 1 filing for a Minnesota court case over the state’s new ban on political deepfakes."
#AI
https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/stanford-expert-gpt-minnesota-deepfakes-19954595.php
Show Original Post
europesays (@europesays@pubeurope.com)
https://www.europesays.com/1659757/ Everything you need to know about the AI chatbot #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #ChatGPT #evergreens #GenerativeAI #OpenAI
Show Original Post
towardsdatascience (@towardsdatascience@me.dm)
Try typing the name "David Mayer" into ChatGPT and see what happens 🕵️♂️ Cassie Kozyrkov dives into this mystery, and the answers have been eye-opening for anyone interested in GenAI, privacy, and data science.
https://towardsdatascience.com/the-name-that-broke-chatgpt-who-is-david-mayer-f03f0dc74877
Show Original Post
